By Stephen Judy
New Mexico has won a historic victory against Meta—and now the state faces an equally important question:
Who should benefit from the $567 million Meta has been ordered to pay?
The answer should be simple: New Mexico’s children.
The First Judicial District Court has ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address the youth mental-health crisis following the State’s successful case against the company. The ruling came after a jury found Meta committed 75,000 violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act, while the court subsequently ruled that Meta’s platforms constituted a public nuisance in New Mexico.
The State brought this case because of alleged harms to children.
So now, as New Mexico decides how this unprecedented amount of money should be used, we should ask a straightforward question:
If the children were the victims, why shouldn’t the children receive the benefit?
What if the money were divided among New Mexico teenagers?
Consider the possibility of establishing a program for New Mexico residents ages 12 through 17.
If approximately 123,000 New Mexico teenagers fall within that age group, dividing the entire $567 million equally would produce approximately:
$$4,609.76 per teenager
That’s $567,000,000 divided by 123,000 children.
That number is remarkable.
Instead of allowing the entire recovery to disappear into general government spending, New Mexico could potentially create a system in which every eligible teenager receives a tangible benefit from the recovery obtained in the name of protecting them.
$ 4,609.76 per teenager.
For a young person, that could be significant.
The money should follow the harm
This isn’t about giving teenagers a random government handout.
It is about asking whether a remedy should actually reach the population that the lawsuit was designed to protect.
New Mexico’s Department of Justice says the court’s $567 million award is intended to address the youth mental-health crisis. The judgment also imposes significant reforms on Meta, including stronger protections for minors, restrictions on certain features, overnight limits on notifications, enhanced privacy protections, mandatory disclosures and other safeguards.
The State has already established the connection between Meta’s conduct and the protection of children.
That makes it reasonable to ask whether the financial component of the remedy should likewise be directed toward those children.
Don’t let the victims become an afterthought
There is an important distinction between a court ordering money to address a public health crisis and a court ordering individual damages to every teenager.
The current judgment does not automatically create a legal entitlement for every 12-to-17-year-old New Mexican to receive $4,609.76 The State would need to determine whether such a distribution is legally permissible and how it could be structured consistent with the court’s order and New Mexico law.
But that does not make the idea unworthy of consideration.
Quite the opposite.
It should become part of the public debate.
If the State can demonstrate that the money was obtained to remedy harms suffered by children, then New Mexicans should demand that the Legislature and executive branch consider a distribution system that places children at the center of the remedy.
A historic opportunity for New Mexico
New Mexico is a relatively small state. That makes this opportunity even more interesting.
The state’s population is roughly 2.1 million people, with approximately 20.7% under age 18.
A $567 million youth-focused recovery could therefore become one of the most significant investments in New Mexico’s children in state history.
Rather than simply spending the money and moving on, New Mexico could create a transparent, independently monitored fund whose benefits can be tracked for decades.
Every teenager could know:
“This money came from a case brought to protect kids like me.”
That would give the judgment a meaning far beyond the courtroom.
The principle is bigger than Meta
This isn’t ultimately about Meta.
It is about accountability.
When a company is accused of creating products that expose children to serious risks, and the State brings a historic lawsuit to hold that company accountable, the resulting remedy should be carefully connected to the problem that produced it.
The New Mexico Department of Justice has described the ruling as a historic victory and says the court’s decision establishes that a social-media company can be held financially and structurally accountable for products that endanger children.
Now New Mexico has an opportunity to make the next statement.
The children who were at the center of the case should be at the center of the recovery.
Give the money back to the kids
If approximately 110,000 New Mexico teenagers ages 12–17 are used as the eligible population, the mathematics are straightforward:
$567 million ÷ 123,000 teenagers = approximately $4,609.76 per teenager.
That figure is not a current legal entitlement. It is a proposed distribution model.
But it raises a powerful question:
If this money was obtained because New Mexico’s children were harmed, shouldn’t New Mexico’s children receive a meaningful share of the remedy?
The State went to court to protect its children.
Now, after winning, it should make sure the children are not forgotten when the money is distributed.
The lawsuit was about the kids.
The remedy should be about the kids, too.
















































