New Mexico’s Water Is Too Valuable to Risk on Data Centers

By on • ( Leave a comment )

By: Stephen Judy

ALBUQUERQUE — New Mexico has spent decades learning a difficult lesson: water is not an unlimited resource.

From the Rio Grande to the state’s underground aquifers, communities, farmers, ranchers and businesses are being asked to do more with less. In that environment, the rapid expansion of artificial-intelligence data centers deserves much greater scrutiny—not because technology is inherently bad, but because New Mexico must decide whether scarce water should be committed to an industry capable of consuming enormous quantities of it.

The issue is becoming increasingly important as major technology companies pursue large computing facilities across the state.

One of the clearest examples is already close to Albuquerque. According to information presented by the New Mexico Office of the State Engineer, Meta’s data center in Los Lunas has averaged approximately 213.4 acre-feet of water per year, or roughly 69 million gallons annually. The state presentation equates that annual use to approximately 860 households. The presentation also states that water consumption is primarily associated with cooling the facility.

That number should make New Mexicans stop and ask a basic question: Is this the best use of our limited water?

Data centers require enormous amounts of computing equipment. Those computers generate substantial heat, and that heat must be removed continuously. Traditional cooling-tower systems can consume water through evaporation. The U.S. Department of Energy explains that cooling-tower water demand is directly related to the heat generated by information-technology equipment and that evaporation is a primary source of water consumption.

For a state such as New Mexico, that matters.

New Mexico is not Oregon or Minnesota. We live in one of the driest states in the country, and water decisions made today can affect communities and agriculture for generations.

The concern becomes even more significant when data centers are built at enormous scales.

The proposed Project Jupiter in southern New Mexico, associated with Oracle and OpenAI, has become a particularly controversial example. The $165 billion project has generated opposition over its potential water requirements. The project’s developers say newer technologies, including closed-loop cooling and fuel-cell systems, can substantially reduce water consumption. At the same time, environmental groups and residents have challenged water approvals associated with the development.

That disagreement illustrates an important point: the question is not simply whether a particular data center can reduce its water use. The question is whether New Mexico should be allocating scarce water resources to rapidly expanding data-center development in the first place—and under what conditions.

There is also an important distinction between different generations of data-center technology.

Not every data center has the same water footprint. Modern closed-loop systems can dramatically reduce freshwater consumption, and technologies that rely on air cooling or other approaches can reduce or eliminate some water requirements. The Department of Energy has highlighted cooling technologies that can save millions of gallons of water at computing facilities.

That means the debate should not be reduced to “technology versus the environment.”

It should instead be about where data centers are built, how they are cooled, whose water they use, how much water they consume over their entire operating life, and who bears the cost when water becomes scarcer.

New Mexico lawmakers and regulators should require those questions to be answered before approving major projects.

For example, every proposed large-scale data center should disclose its expected annual water consumption under normal conditions as well as during extreme heat and drought. Developers should be required to identify the source of that water and demonstrate that the project will not undermine existing domestic, agricultural or municipal supplies.

The state should also distinguish between freshwater and alternative sources such as treated wastewater or appropriately treated brackish water. New Mexico has already examined alternative water supplies for industrial applications, including data centers, although those alternatives come with their own financial, energy and environmental considerations.

Most importantly, New Mexico should not allow economic-development promises to obscure the long-term value of water.

Data centers can bring construction work, tax revenue and high-paying technical employment. Those benefits are real. Developers should also be encouraged to use technologies that minimize water consumption. But economic benefits do not make water unlimited.

A data center can be relocated.

A server can be upgraded.

A corporation can move its investment somewhere else.

An aquifer cannot be replaced on a corporate timetable.

New Mexico should therefore adopt a simple principle: if a company wants to build one of the world’s largest computing facilities in our state, it should have to prove that its water use is sustainable before the first shovel goes into the ground.

This is not an argument against artificial intelligence, computers or economic development.

It is an argument for putting New Mexico’s most valuable natural resource first.

For Albuquerque and communities throughout the Rio Grande corridor, the lesson is particularly important. Population growth, housing development, agriculture, industry and climate pressures are already competing for the same finite resource.

New Mexico should welcome innovation—but innovation should include finding ways to operate without consuming the water that New Mexico’s communities will need tomorrow.

Our state should not have to choose between economic progress and water security. But if that choice ever comes, water has to win.

If New Mexico’s Children Were the Victims of Meta,They Should be compensated directly from the Settlement.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

By Stephen Judy

New Mexico has won a historic victory against Meta—and now the state faces an equally important question:

Who should benefit from the $567 million Meta has been ordered to pay?

The answer should be simple: New Mexico’s children.

The First Judicial District Court has ordered Meta to pay $567 million to address the youth mental-health crisis following the State’s successful case against the company. The ruling came after a jury found Meta committed 75,000 violations of New Mexico’s Unfair Practices Act, while the court subsequently ruled that Meta’s platforms constituted a public nuisance in New Mexico.

The State brought this case because of alleged harms to children.

So now, as New Mexico decides how this unprecedented amount of money should be used, we should ask a straightforward question:

If the children were the victims, why shouldn’t the children receive the benefit?

What if the money were divided among New Mexico teenagers?

Consider the possibility of establishing a program for New Mexico residents ages 12 through 17.

If approximately 123,000 New Mexico teenagers fall within that age group, dividing the entire $567 million equally would produce approximately:

$$4,609.76 per teenager

That’s $567,000,000 divided by 123,000 children.

That number is remarkable.

Instead of allowing the entire recovery to disappear into general government spending, New Mexico could potentially create a system in which every eligible teenager receives a tangible benefit from the recovery obtained in the name of protecting them.

$ 4,609.76 per teenager.

For a young person, that could be significant.

The money should follow the harm

This isn’t about giving teenagers a random government handout.

It is about asking whether a remedy should actually reach the population that the lawsuit was designed to protect.

New Mexico’s Department of Justice says the court’s $567 million award is intended to address the youth mental-health crisis. The judgment also imposes significant reforms on Meta, including stronger protections for minors, restrictions on certain features, overnight limits on notifications, enhanced privacy protections, mandatory disclosures and other safeguards.

The State has already established the connection between Meta’s conduct and the protection of children.

That makes it reasonable to ask whether the financial component of the remedy should likewise be directed toward those children.

Don’t let the victims become an afterthought

There is an important distinction between a court ordering money to address a public health crisis and a court ordering individual damages to every teenager.

The current judgment does not automatically create a legal entitlement for every 12-to-17-year-old New Mexican to receive $4,609.76 The State would need to determine whether such a distribution is legally permissible and how it could be structured consistent with the court’s order and New Mexico law.

But that does not make the idea unworthy of consideration.

Quite the opposite.

It should become part of the public debate.

If the State can demonstrate that the money was obtained to remedy harms suffered by children, then New Mexicans should demand that the Legislature and executive branch consider a distribution system that places children at the center of the remedy.

A historic opportunity for New Mexico

New Mexico is a relatively small state. That makes this opportunity even more interesting.

The state’s population is roughly 2.1 million people, with approximately 20.7% under age 18.

A $567 million youth-focused recovery could therefore become one of the most significant investments in New Mexico’s children in state history.

Rather than simply spending the money and moving on, New Mexico could create a transparent, independently monitored fund whose benefits can be tracked for decades.

Every teenager could know:

“This money came from a case brought to protect kids like me.”

That would give the judgment a meaning far beyond the courtroom.

The principle is bigger than Meta

This isn’t ultimately about Meta.

It is about accountability.

When a company is accused of creating products that expose children to serious risks, and the State brings a historic lawsuit to hold that company accountable, the resulting remedy should be carefully connected to the problem that produced it.

The New Mexico Department of Justice has described the ruling as a historic victory and says the court’s decision establishes that a social-media company can be held financially and structurally accountable for products that endanger children.

Now New Mexico has an opportunity to make the next statement.

The children who were at the center of the case should be at the center of the recovery.

Give the money back to the kids

If approximately 110,000 New Mexico teenagers ages 12–17 are used as the eligible population, the mathematics are straightforward:

$567 million ÷ 123,000 teenagers = approximately $4,609.76 per teenager.

That figure is not a current legal entitlement. It is a proposed distribution model.

But it raises a powerful question:

If this money was obtained because New Mexico’s children were harmed, shouldn’t New Mexico’s children receive a meaningful share of the remedy?

The State went to court to protect its children.

Now, after winning, it should make sure the children are not forgotten when the money is distributed.

The lawsuit was about the kids.

The remedy should be about the kids, too.

New Mexico gives option to skip the Bar Exam.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

SANTA FE, N.M. — New Mexico is moving to fundamentally change how some aspiring attorneys can become licensed, creating an alternative pathway that allows qualifying law school graduates to become lawyers without taking the traditional bar examination.

The New Mexico Supreme Court announced the new licensing pathway this week, making New Mexico the latest state to experiment with alternatives to the traditional bar exam. The program is expected to begin in 2027.

Under the new system, eligible law school graduates will be required to complete 675 hours of supervised legal work within one year. Instead of demonstrating competency primarily through a high-stakes examination, participants will compile a portfolio of their legal work for evaluation by the state’s Board of Bar Examiners.

The traditional bar examination will not disappear. Graduates who prefer the conventional route will still be able to take the bar exam.

A major change in lawyer licensing

The decision represents a significant shift in the philosophy behind attorney licensing. Supporters of alternative licensing argue that practicing law requires skills that are difficult to measure through a standardized examination, including legal research, drafting, client communication, negotiation and practical problem-solving.

A New Mexico Supreme Court committee that studied alternative licensing concluded that the traditional bar examination does not adequately measure many of the practical skills required in legal practice. The committee also identified the financial burden associated with bar preparation as a concern.

New Mexico Chief Justice Julie Vargas said the alternative pathway could also help address the state’s shortage of attorneys, particularly outside the state’s largest population centers.

That shortage is significant. According to the Supreme Court, approximately two-thirds of New Mexico counties have fewer than one lawyer for every 1,000 residents, conditions that contribute to what the American Bar Association has described as “legal deserts.”

What graduates will actually have to do

The new pathway is not simply a free pass around the bar exam.

A participant will have to:

  • Graduate from law school and satisfy the applicable eligibility requirements.
  • Complete 675 hours of supervised legal work.
  • Complete the supervised practice within one year.
  • Work under the supervision of a qualified attorney or approved host organization.
  • Produce a portfolio demonstrating their legal work and professional competency.
  • Have that portfolio reviewed by the New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners.
  • Satisfy the other requirements for admission to practice law.

The result is a licensing model based substantially on demonstrated practical competence, rather than relying exclusively on performance on a standardized examination.

New Mexico joins a growing national experiment

New Mexico is not alone in reconsidering the traditional bar exam.

Oregon became a major catalyst for the current movement when it created an apprenticeship-style pathway in 2023. Washington followed with an alternative supervised-practice model in 2024, while Arizona, South Dakota and Utahhave also adopted or developed alternative approaches. Nevada has pursued a licensing system combining examination and supervised practice.

The movement reflects a broader debate within the legal profession over whether a two- or three-day examination should remain the primary gateway between graduating from law school and practicing law.

Critics, however, warn that eliminating or reducing the role of the bar examination could create questions about consistency and public protection. They argue that the examination provides an objective minimum competency standard and that alternative systems must ensure that new attorneys are adequately prepared to represent clients.

The timing is notable

The announcement comes as New Mexico is already transitioning its bar examination system.

The New Mexico Board of Bar Examiners has confirmed that the NextGen bar examination is scheduled to begin in New Mexico in July 2027.

That means aspiring New Mexico attorneys entering the profession will soon have an important choice: pursue the traditional examination route or, if they qualify, pursue the new supervised-practice pathway.

For future law students, the change could have substantial consequences. A graduate who performs poorly under traditional standardized testing conditions could potentially demonstrate competency through a year of actual supervised legal work instead.

What this means for future New Mexico lawyers

The change does not mean that someone can simply graduate from law school and immediately call themselves an attorney.

Law school graduation alone does not confer a license to practice law. Applicants must still satisfy New Mexico’s admission requirements and successfully complete whichever licensing pathway applies to them.

What has changed is the possibility of demonstrating professional competence through supervised legal practice and a portfolio of work instead of the traditional bar examination.

For aspiring attorneys, particularly those interested in practicing in rural New Mexico, the new system could represent one of the most consequential changes to the state’s legal profession in decades.

The first participants are expected to enter the new pathway in 2027.

Bottom line: New Mexico is not abolishing the bar exam. It is creating a second route to attorney licensure—one centered on supervised practice and demonstrated legal work rather than a traditional standardized examination.

New Mexicans choose Democrats this time around.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

New Mexicans don’t appreciate having their intelligence insulted, and they certainly don’t like being lied to. Yet that is exactly what many believe is happening when the Republican Party refuses to take accountability for its record.

The numbers speak for themselves. Prices on everyday necessities—from lettuce to fuel—have remained high, tariffs have created economic challenges, and job growth has dramatically fallen short of expectations. Despite these concerns, party leaders often act as though everything is fine. It isn’t.

When elected officials refuse to acknowledge problems or accept responsibility, many voters see it as dismissive of the people they represent. That is why many New Mexicans are expected to support Democratic candidates this November.

Supreme Court rejects fascist attack on Birthright Citizenship

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Birthright citizenship has been a hall mark of American culture since time immemorial.The right,idea, custom and tradition that if you are born on American soil ,despite the circumstances,you are an American with all rights and privileges thereto. Despite the forces of fascism in high places seeking to destroy this right , the United States Supreme Court has protected the country again ruling that Birthright citizenship shall be upheld.

Birthright Citizenship in the United States: A Constitutional Principle Reaffirmed

Birthright citizenship has been a defining feature of American constitutional law for more than 150 years. Rooted in the aftermath of the Civil War, the principle was designed to ensure that anyone born on American soil would be recognized as a citizen regardless of race, ancestry, or social status. Over the decades, it has become one of the most enduring guarantees of the United States Constitution.

On June 30, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed that principle in a landmark 6–3 decision, ruling that the Constitution protects birthright citizenship and rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to limit automatic citizenship for many children born in the United States. The ruling marked one of the most significant constitutional decisions of the Court’s term and reaffirmed more than a century of legal precedent.

The Origins of Birthright Citizenship

Before the Civil War, citizenship in the United States was far from universal. The infamous 1857 Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sandford declared that people of African descent could never become American citizens, even if they had been born in the United States.

Following the Union’s victory in the Civil War, Congress sought to permanently overturn that decision. In 1868, the nation ratified the Fourteenth Amendment, whose Citizenship Clause states:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

The amendment was intended to guarantee citizenship to formerly enslaved people while establishing a clear constitutional rule that citizenship is based primarily on birthplace rather than ancestry.

The Wong Kim Ark Decision

Although the amendment’s language was clear, questions arose regarding children born to immigrant parents.

In 1898, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Wong Kim Ark. Wong Kim Ark was born in California to Chinese parents who were legally residing in the United States but were barred from becoming naturalized citizens under federal law.

When he was denied reentry into the country after traveling abroad, the Supreme Court ruled that because he had been born on American soil, he was an American citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment.

That decision established the modern understanding of birthright citizenship and has remained one of the Court’s most important constitutional precedents for more than 125 years.

Challenges Through the Years

Although birthright citizenship has long been accepted by courts, it has periodically become a subject of political debate, particularly regarding illegal immigration.

Supporters of limiting birthright citizenship have argued that the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” excludes children born to parents who are in the United States unlawfully or temporarily.

Opponents counter that the Constitution, federal law, and more than a century of Supreme Court precedent recognize nearly everyone born in the United States as a citizen, with only narrow exceptions such as children of foreign diplomats or occupying enemy forces.

The 2026 Supreme Court Decision

After returning to office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order seeking to deny automatic citizenship to many children born in the United States whose parents were not citizens or lawful permanent residents.

The order was immediately challenged in federal courts, which blocked its implementation while litigation proceeded.

On June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that the executive order violated the Fourteenth Amendment and reaffirmed that birthright citizenship remains protected by the Constitution. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, emphasizing that the Citizenship Clause guarantees citizenship to nearly everyone born on U.S. soil. The decision reaffirmed the Court’s longstanding interpretation dating back to United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

Three justices dissented, arguing that the Constitution should be interpreted differently with respect to the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” Nevertheless, the majority concluded that more than a century of constitutional precedent supported maintaining birthright citizenship as it has traditionally been understood.

Why the Decision Matters

The ruling preserves one of the nation’s oldest constitutional guarantees and provides certainty regarding the citizenship status of children born in the United States.

Legal scholars widely view the decision as reinforcing the stability of constitutional precedent while confirming that major changes to citizenship rights cannot be accomplished through executive action alone.

The decision also underscores the continuing importance of the Fourteenth Amendment, adopted after the Civil War to ensure equal citizenship under the law. More than 150 years later, its Citizenship Clause remains one of the strongest constitutional protections in American law.

Looking Ahead

The Supreme Court’s 2026 ruling closes one of the most consequential constitutional disputes over citizenship in modern history. While debates over immigration policy are likely to continue, the Court reaffirmed that birthright citizenship remains a constitutional guarantee for nearly all children born on American soil.

From the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 to the landmark United States v. Wong Kim Ark decision in 1898 and now the Court’s 2026 ruling, the principle of birthright citizenship has endured through changing political climates. The latest decision reinforces that constitutional rights, once firmly established by the nation’s highest court, remain protected unless changed through the constitutional amendment process rather than executive action.

Save our Lobos !

By on • ( Leave a comment )

There are 319 Mexican grey wolves in New Mexico , the word LOBO comes from the Mexican grey wolf the rarest and most endangered of all wolves and also the mascot of the University of New Mexico; so when you proudly wear your UNM LOBO regalia remember the wolves who’s strong unwavering spirit we represent and do your part to protect them and the delicate ecosystem they keep in the Balance, call your senator and habitat park rangers and donate to keep the LOBO spirit alive! GO LOBOS!


The Plight of the Mexican Gray Wolf
The Mexican gray wolf (Canis lupus baileyi), often called el lobo, is one of North America’s most endangered mammals. Once roaming widely across the deserts, grasslands, and mountain forests of the American Southwest and northern Mexico, this unique subspecies of gray wolf was pushed to the brink of extinction through decades of persecution, habitat loss, and human conflict. Although conservation efforts have prevented its disappearance, the Mexican gray wolf continues to face significant challenges in its struggle for survival.
A History of Decline
For thousands of years, Mexican gray wolves played an important role as apex predators, helping maintain healthy ecosystems by regulating populations of deer, elk, and other prey species. However, as European settlers expanded across the Southwest during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, attitudes toward wolves became increasingly hostile.
Ranchers viewed wolves as threats to livestock, and government agencies launched widespread predator-control campaigns. Wolves were trapped, shot, and poisoned throughout their range. By the 1970s, the Mexican gray wolf had been nearly eradicated from the wild in both the United States and Mexico.
Recognizing the danger of extinction, wildlife officials captured the last remaining wild Mexican gray wolves for a captive breeding program. Remarkably, the entire surviving population descended from only a handful of animals. While this effort saved the subspecies from extinction, it also created long-term genetic challenges.
The Road to Recovery
In 1998, conservationists began reintroducing captive-bred Mexican gray wolves into portions of Arizona and New Mexico. The goal was to restore a self-sustaining wild population and reestablish the ecological role wolves once played in the region.
The reintroduction program achieved important successes. Wolves established packs, reproduced in the wild, and gradually expanded their numbers. Today, the population is significantly larger than it was at the start of the recovery effort.
Yet recovery remains fragile. The population is still relatively small compared with historical numbers, and the wolves occupy only a fraction of their former range. Conservationists warn that true recovery requires larger, connected populations capable of maintaining healthy genetic diversity over the long term.
Ongoing Threats
Despite legal protections, Mexican gray wolves continue to face numerous threats.
Human-Wildlife Conflict
One of the most persistent challenges involves conflicts with livestock producers. While wolves primarily hunt wild prey, some occasionally attack cattle or sheep. These incidents can lead to demands for wolf removal and generate opposition to recovery efforts.
Wildlife agencies often work with ranchers to reduce conflicts through nonlethal methods such as range riders, guard animals, and improved livestock management. However, tensions between conservation goals and economic concerns remain.
Illegal Killing
Poaching continues to be a significant cause of wolf mortality. Some wolves are illegally shot despite federal protections. Because the population remains relatively small, the loss of even a few breeding animals can have a substantial impact on recovery efforts.
Genetic Limitations
The Mexican gray wolf’s narrow genetic foundation is another major concern. Descended from a very small number of founders, the population has limited genetic diversity. This can increase the risk of inherited health problems and reduce the population’s ability to adapt to environmental changes.
Conservation biologists have emphasized the importance of introducing new genetic lines from captive populations into the wild to strengthen the species’ long-term viability.
Habitat Fragmentation
Roads, development, and other human activities can fragment habitat and make it more difficult for wolves to disperse and establish new territories. Connectivity between populations is crucial for maintaining genetic health and allowing wolves to recolonize suitable areas.
Why Wolves Matter
The recovery of the Mexican gray wolf is about more than saving a single species. Wolves are a keystone predator, meaning their presence influences many other parts of the ecosystem.
By helping control populations of large herbivores, wolves can affect vegetation, which in turn influences birds, small mammals, and other wildlife. Healthy predator populations contribute to balanced ecosystems and greater biodiversity.
The Mexican gray wolf also holds cultural significance. Indigenous peoples of the Southwest have long recognized the wolf’s importance in stories, traditions, and spiritual beliefs. Its recovery represents not only a biological achievement but also the restoration of an important part of the region’s natural heritage.
Looking Forward
The story of the Mexican gray wolf is one of both tragedy and hope. Human actions nearly drove the subspecies to extinction, yet dedicated conservation efforts prevented its disappearance and allowed it to return to the wild. Today, the wolf’s future remains uncertain. Continued recovery will require cooperation among wildlife managers, conservation organizations, ranchers, Indigenous communities, policymakers, and the public.
Whether the Mexican gray wolf ultimately thrives or once again declines will depend on society’s willingness to balance human needs with the preservation of one of North America’s most iconic predators. Its survival stands as a test of our commitment to protecting endangered wildlife and restoring the ecosystems upon which they depend.

Please help us increase criminal penalties for poachers of the Mexican grey wolf ..

Harold Pope Jr. Best choice for New Mexico Lt.Governor

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Harold Pope Junior is the best choice for New Mexico governor because he brings strength and balance to the office. As a former Air Force officer Pope brings essential leadership in support of Haaland initiatives benefiting our State.

New Mexico deserves a lieutenant governor who combines proven leadership, public service, and a commitment to improving the lives of working families. Harold Pope Jr. brings a unique combination of military service, legislative experience, and a record of community leadership that makes him an outstanding choice for the office.

As a retired U.S. Air Force officer and current New Mexico State Senator, Pope has dedicated his career to serving others. In the Legislature, he has worked on issues including education, veterans’ services, public safety, economic opportunity, renewable energy, and protecting the rights of New Mexicans. His experience gives him a strong understanding of how state government works and how to build bipartisan solutions that benefit communities across the state.

Harold Pope Jr. also made history as the first African American elected to the New Mexico Senate, demonstrating his commitment to expanding opportunity and representation for all New Mexicans. Throughout his career, he has emphasized integrity, accountability, and service above politics.

His campaign for lieutenant governor focuses on strengthening the economy, supporting public education, protecting healthcare access, investing in veterans and working families, and ensuring that every community—from rural towns to urban neighborhoods—has a voice in state government.

At a time when New Mexico faces important challenges and opportunities, Harold Pope Jr. offers experienced, thoughtful leadership grounded in service. His record shows a willingness to work hard, listen to constituents, and fight for policies that help families succeed. For voters seeking a leader with experience, vision, and a deep commitment to New Mexico’s future, Harold Pope Jr. stands out as the best choice for lieutenant governor.

For more information about his campaign and policy positions, see Harold Pope Jr. for Lieutenant Governor.

Currently offering free real estate advertising on DukeCityTimes.com

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Do you have a real estate business? maybe a listing ?the Duke city time is currently offering free advertising for real estate professionals just email dukecitytimes@gmail.com with your interest in advertising and we’ll sign you up to advertise your business Call 505-919-9681.

*Your business advertisement could be shared on Dukecitytimes.com,Albuquerque auto sales , New Mexico real estate network , New Mexico models, New Mexico farm and ranch , New Mexico film network..

  • This free advertisement opportunity by using you hold DCT harmless for profits or any losses.



New Mexico needs municipalization of our public utilities.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Municipalization:a city or county can legally explore taking over the utility infrastructure in its boundaries entirely to establish a city-owned public utility.

If New Mexico can work with our local authorities to help cities purchase PNM infrastructure and develop our municipal energy resources; New Mexicans will be able to keep their energy and fate in their own hands instead of selling our energy system to out of state billion dollar Companies.

DCT Forecast Deb Haaland will be Governor of New Mexico

By on • ( Leave a comment )

The Times is forecasting that Deb Haaland will win the 2026 New Mexico gubernatorial election in a landslide simply because citizens are simply tired of the disaster the republicans have caused in Washington ;which has far reaching effects in New Mexico.After illegal tariffs raising global prices and illegal wars raising energy prices, peoples pockets books are tired as well.Many ranchers and farmers have suffered nationwide due to Republican policies , increased fuel and fertilizer cost has left many wishing they never voted red .After winning the democratic nomination in June Haalands momentum hasn’t stopped and she’s steaming along to the governor’s mansion..

Duke City Times Endorses David Mooney For NM House District 38

By on • ( Leave a comment )

As New Mexico navigates a pivotal era of economic transition and community growth, the choice for House District 38 has never been more consequential. To ensure a future that prioritizes sustainable development, educational equity, and transparent governance, David Mooney stands out as the candidate with the integrity and fresh perspective required to move our district forward.

A Grassroots Vision for District 38

David Mooney enters the race with a clear, community-focused platform. Unlike traditional career politicians who often find themselves beholden to established party structures, Mooney’s campaign is rooted in a grassroots approach. He understands that the unique challenges facing Sierra, Grant, and Hidalgo counties cannot be solved with “business as usual” politics.

His commitment to representing District 38 as a dedicated advocate means prioritizing the voices of everyday New Mexicans over special interests. Mooney’s entry into the race as a candidate driven by civic duty highlights his desire to bring accountability back to Santa Fe.

Comparing Records: Stability vs. Fresh Solutions

When looking at the needs of our district, we must evaluate the results of the past against the potential of the future. While the seat has seen various representatives over the years, many voters feel that the core issues—rural healthcare access, infrastructure, and job diversification—have remained stagnant.

  • Economic Diversification: Mooney advocates for modernizing New Mexico’s economy by supporting small businesses and local entrepreneurs. He recognizes that while traditional industries are vital, the district must also embrace renewable energy and technology sectors to provide long-term stability for our youth.
  • Infrastructure and Local Resources: Mooney’s platform emphasizes the critical need for improved broadband and water management. He views these not as luxury projects, but as the fundamental backbone of a thriving rural economy.
  • Transparent Governance: One of Mooney’s strongest pillars is his focus on ethical leadership. By running a campaign centered on direct engagement, he is setting a standard for transparency that ensures every constituent has a seat at the table.

The Choice for Progress

District 38 deserves a representative who is more focused on the next generation than the next election cycle. David Mooney offers a principled alternative to the status quo. His record of community involvement and his pragmatic, common-sense approach to policy make him the ideal choice for those who are tired of partisan gridlock.

By choosing David Mooney, voters are choosing a leader who will fight for:

  1. Lowering the cost of living for working families.
  2. Protecting rural healthcare facilities from closure.
  3. Investing in public schools to ensure every child in District 38 has a world-class education.

It is time for a representative who listens more than they lecture and acts more than they argue. This November, a vote for David Mooney is a vote for a stronger, more prosperous, and more inclusive New Mexico.

Duke City Times Endorses Deb Haaland

By on • ( Leave a comment )

As New Mexico approaches a consequential election, voters face a choice not just between candidates, but between governing philosophies. After reviewing campaign platforms, public statements, and the current political landscape, the Duke City Times editorial board supports Deb Haaland as the candidate best positioned to lead the state—and to stand up effectively in a political environment shaped by figures such as Donald Trump.

This endorsement reflects an assessment of both policy direction and political viability.

Deb Haaland’s campaign emphasizes expanded access to healthcare, investment in education, and efforts to address housing affordability. Her platform frames New Mexico’s challenges as rooted in long-standing gaps in economic opportunity and public investment. In contrast, her opponent, Sam Bregman, has centered his campaign on public safety, economic pragmatism, and a more centrist approach to governance.

Both perspectives speak to real concerns. Crime, cost of living, and access to opportunity remain pressing issues across the state. However, the question for voters is not only which problems to prioritize, but which candidate is best positioned to build the coalition necessary to address them.

Available public polling and party data indicate that Haaland currently holds a significant advantage among Democratic voters, along with stronger institutional support and fundraising capacity. In a state that has leaned Democratic in recent election cycles, this level of support may be decisive in a general election. While Bregman’s centrist positioning could appeal to some independent voters, there is limited public evidence at this stage that his campaign has consolidated a broad base of support.

Just as important is the national political context. Elections in New Mexico do not occur in isolation. The continued influence of Donald Trump on Republican politics has reshaped campaign dynamics across the country. In that environment, candidates often succeed not only by persuading undecided voters, but by energizing their own base.

On that measure, Haaland appears better positioned. Her national profile, alignment with widely supported Democratic priorities, and ability to mobilize key constituencies—including younger voters and communities historically underrepresented in politics—suggest a capacity to generate turnout that could be critical in a competitive race.

This is not to dismiss the arguments put forward by Bregman. His focus on public safety and economic concerns reflects issues that deserve sustained attention, regardless of who holds office. Effective governance will require addressing those priorities as well.

Nevertheless, elections ultimately require a judgment about who can both win and govern. Based on the information currently available, Deb Haaland demonstrates a stronger combination of political support, organizational strength, and alignment with the state’s prevailing electorate.

For these reasons, the Duke City Times endorses Deb Haaland.

This endorsement is offered in recognition of the challenges ahead and with the expectation that, if elected, she will govern with attention to the full range of issues facing New Mexico residents.

New Mexico State Police identify remains as missing man, Joel “Deano” Valdez

By on • ( Leave a comment )

April 16th, 2026

Santa Fe, NM–The New Mexico State Police is providing an update in the ongoing investigation into the disappearance of Joel “Deano” Valdez.

On April 12, 2026, the NMSP Investigations Bureau received information regarding human remains located by a person walking their dog on Caja del Rio Road in Santa Fe County. Through coordination with the Office of the Medical Investigator (OMI), the individual has been positively identified as missing person, Joel “Deano” Valdez.

The cause and manner of death have not yet been determined. The remains will undergo further anthropological examination by OMI.

Mr. Valdez was initially reported missing on September 21, 2025, after he failed to return home to Coyote after work in Silver City. Since that time, the New Mexico State Police has conducted an extensive investigation, which remains active and ongoing.

The New Mexico State Police extend their deepest condolences to the Valdez family during this difficult time.

Anyone with information related to this case is encouraged to contact the New Mexico State Police at 505-841-9256.

Stocks rise after Strait of Hormuz is announced open.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Whether they plan it or its a mistake, one thing we see with all these global crisis, is that the stock market will plummet, the crisis will be solved and then the stocks will rise, as we are seeing this week. This isn’t financial advice, but doesn’t it seem like these crisis are orchestrated to manipulate the stock market so one is able to easily judge when to buy or sell.I know its not how things are supposed to transpire but they are transpiring this way, what do we do not play the market ? what are your thoughts?

US captures Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro

By on • ( Leave a comment )

In the early hours of January 3, 2026 United States forces attacked many sites in Venezuela and captured Venezuela president Nicholas Maduro President Trump of the United States says that this was a police action using military personnel and equipment but the question is was Congress‘s approval needed to attack Major infrastructure of another country using military equipment and taking their president captive?

Kellers words ring true with voters.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

During a recent debate, Mayor Tim Keller drew a direct contrast between his record and that of his challenger, noting that the opponent is a supporter of President Donald Trump. Keller argued that such support raises concerns for some Albuquerque voters, implying , “Why would we elect someone who aligns with policies many residents feel are harming the city and country?”

Political analysts say Keller’s remarks may resonate with segments of the electorate who were critical of the Trump administration since it did remove some funding from the city of Albuquerque and Critics of the president have pointed to issues such as trade-related tariffs, economic concerns, and ethics investigations as reasons for their opposition.

Keller suggested that choosing a candidate aligned with Trump could signal a negative direction for Albuquerque a sentiment many many voters agree with ..

St. Joseph Mission school

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Contact: Bob Ippel, Executive Director, NMANS

The New Mexico Association of Non-public Schools

Email:nmansinfo@gmail.com

Website: http://www.nmans.org

505-870-9621

St. Joseph Mission School

Nestled in the heart of Northwestern New Mexico, St. Joseph Mission School shines brightly in

the village of San Fidel. Established by the Franciscans in 1923, this school was created to

nurture the Pueblo communities of Acoma and Laguna, along with the nearby Spanish villages

of San Fidel, Cubero, and Seboyeta.

St. Joseph School embodies a proud legacy that began in 1644, when the San Estevan Mission

at Acoma Pueblo opened its doors with a humble classroom. The educational journey continued

in 1699 at the San Jose Mission in Laguna Pueblo, where the foundations of reading, writing,

and math were established. These historic missions not only introduced new languages and

cultural insights but also honored traditional ways of life. Today, St. Joseph School remains

deeply committed to this vital mission, seamlessly blending the richness of the past with the

promise of a bright future.

Since its establishment, numerous alumni from St. Joseph’s School have successfully pursued

careers in various fields, including medicine, nursing, business ownership, education, public

service, and leadership within both state and tribal contexts in New Mexico. Notably, the current

Governor of Acoma, Charles Riley, is a distinguished alumnus of St. Joseph’s School. Theinstitution thoughtfully integrates Traditional Native and Catholic cultural elements, reflecting the

rich heritage of our local communities.

St. Joseph School is an exceptional Pre-K through 6th grade Micro-School, leveraging a proven

educational model that has thrived for decades. Microschooling, far from being a novel concept,

has been successfully implemented in various environments where traditional teaching faced

challenges, particularly due to overcrowding. Our class sizes are significantly smaller than those

in traditional schools, allowing for more personalized attention and a focus on mixed-age level

groupings.

As a microschool, we are committed to our unique educational mission while embodying key

characteristics that set us apart. Our approach emphasizes personable, project-based learning,

fostering stronger relationships between adults and children. Our educators actively facilitate

student-led learning experiences rather than merely delivering content.

Students at St. Joseph School are not just learners; they are active participants in their

communities. They engage in service-learning projects and community service, and they

proudly attend our feast day masses and celebrations. This commitment to community

involvement strengthens the bonds among our educators, families, and the wider community,

empowering students to take ownership of their learning journey.

St. Joseph School collaborates with esteemed organizations such as the University of Notre

Dame, Catholic Alliance for Education, American Indian Catholic School Network, Western

Catholic Education Association, and the National Catholic Education Association to enhance

Professional Development for our dedicated educators. Through these powerful partnerships,

we are committed to providing our students with exceptional educational experiences that

prepare them for success in higher education and beyond.

For more information, visit https://www.stjosephmissionschool.com/

Tim Keller Wins KOB4 mayoral run off debate 2025

By on • ( Leave a comment )

It appears that Tim Keller’s rebuttals were both substantive and composed, even in the face of his opponent’s Trump-like slogans such as “on day one”—promises that, notably, Trump himself failed to fulfill. Keller’s plans for the city have shown measurable progress; a recent APD study indicates that crime has fallen across all key areas. It may simply take time for Keller’s initiatives to fully blossom—but evidence suggests they already are. Throughout the debate, Keller avoided empty slogans and divisive rhetoric, instead presenting a thoughtful plan focused on enforcing the law, protecting citizens’ rights, and improving the city. For these reasons, our editorial staff believes that Keller was the clear victor of tonight’s debate.

Centrist democrats cave to republicans opening the government

By on • ( Leave a comment )

In the latest chapter of Washington gridlock, moderate Democrats have walked into the spotlight not as negotiators who secured key wins—but as lawmakers who broke ranks to reopen the government on terms many in their party view as unacceptably weak. Whether this move will be seen in hindsight as pragmatic governance or strategic capitulation remains to be seen.

The lawmakers who crossed the aisle include: Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), John Fetterman (Pa.), Tim Kaine (Va.), Jacky Rosen (Nev.), Dick Durbin (Ill.), and Angus King (Maine) (the independent who caucuses with Democrats). 

Alex Uballez best choice for Albuquerque Mayor.

By on • ( Leave a comment )

Alex Uballez, a former U.S. Attorney for New Mexico, is running for mayor of Albuquerque in the November 2025 election. His campaign emphasizes a combination of legal experience, progressive values, and a commitment to public safety and justice.

Legal Expertise and Leadership

Uballez served as the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Mexico from 2022 to 2025, leading a team of 200 federal prosecutors and overseeing statewide law enforcement operations. During his tenure, he prosecuted cartel leaders, human traffickers, and uncovered a longstanding DWI corruption scheme involving multiple law enforcement agencies The Daily Lobo. His leadership also contributed to the establishment of Albuquerque’s Violence Intervention Program and New Mexico’s first federal reentry court, aiming to provide individuals with opportunities for rehabilitation Alex Uballez for Mayor of Albuquerque.

Progressive Values and Community Focus

Born to a Chinese immigrant mother and a Chicano father, Uballez’s background informs his progressive platform, which includes protecting immigrants and addressing income inequality Working Families Party. He has also been endorsed by organizations such as Equality New Mexico, reflecting his commitment to LGBTQ+ rights.

Accountability and Transparency

In his mayoral campaign, Uballez has initiated a nine-point inquiry into the Keller administration, focusing on issues such as potential health hazards during the construction of the Gateway Center and allegations of favoritism and mishandling of federal funds KUNM. This approach underscores his commitment to transparency and accountability in local government.

A Vision for Albuquerque’s Future

Uballez’s campaign is driven by a desire to create a city where his children—and all residents—can thrive. His legal background, progressive values, and focus on public safety position him as a candidate aiming to address Albuquerque’s challenges with a fresh perspective and a commitment to justice.

Bosque farms principle persecuted for speaking the truth about Charlie Kirk and the negative effects of hate speech .

By on • ( Leave a comment )


Schools are not just places of rote instruction—they are places where ideas, values, and civic responsibilities are explored. Even though a principal is an employee subject to district policies, they are also a citizen. If the remarks are made in a context where they’re representing personal opinion (not official policy), then reprimanding them can chill necessary dialogue. Principals should retain some space to speak on public matters—especially when those public matters affect their school community, students, or values the school is supposed to teach (e.g. honesty, justice, civic awareness).
Principals often serve not just as administrators but as moral and ethical guides. When issues emerge that impact students—either directly or indirectly—it is reasonable for a principal to address them. Speaking about a controversial public figure or current events can be a necessary element of guiding students in critical thinking, helping them understand civic dialogue, or standing up against what the principal perceives as wrongdoing. Reprimanding a principal for such speech can send the message that neutrality is always safest, even when moral clarity or leadership is needed.
Charlie Kirk is a public figure, which means that commentary about him is more protected under free‑speech norms than commentary about private individuals. A principal speaking about public discourse or current events is engaging in discussion about public affairs, which is often seen as a core area of protected speech. Unless the speech violates specific policies (for example, it’s hateful, incites violence, defames someone, etc.), a reprimand may be over‑reach.
If school authorities are quick to repress any speech from administrators that touches on politics or public figures, there’s a risk of over‑censorship. Important conversations get avoided. Education becomes sanitized of real issues. Students are shielded from discussion that might help them understand the world. That does harm in the long run.

Reprimanding a principal simply for speaking about a public figure (like Charlie Kirk) is a risky precedent. It threatens free expression, weakens moral leadership, and encourages silence over dialogue. Principals deserve the space to participate in public discussion—especially when issues impact their students or community—and should be defended in doing so, provided their speech is responsible. Education is enriched, not harmed, when leaders engage, think aloud, and model civic participation.